with

import addWith from 'with'; // Basic usage: injects 'obj' properties into scope const code1 = addWith('obj', 'console.log(a)'); console.log('// Code 1:\n', code1); // Expected output (simplified for brevity): ';(function (console, a) { console.log(a) }(...));' // Usage with exclusion: 'console' is treated as global/external const code2 = addWith('obj', 'console.log(a)', ['console']); console.log('\n// Code 2:\n', code2); // Expected output (simplified for brevity): ';(function (a) { console.log(a) }(...));' // Example of how the generated code behaves differently from native `with` const generatedCodeExample = ` const outerFoo = 'original'; const obj = { foo: 'objFoo' }; const addWithResult = addWith('obj', 'foo = \'modified\';', []); // To run this, you'd typically need a code execution context like a VM or eval // For demonstration, let's just log the expected behavior difference. // If this were native 'with (obj) { foo = 'modified'; }', // obj.foo would become 'modified'. // With compile-time 'with', `foo` becomes a local variable within the generated scope, // and assignments to `foo` do not affect `obj.foo` or `outerFoo`. `; console.log('\n// Example illustrating behavior difference with assignments (conceptual):'); console.log(generatedCodeExample);